Compliments and Politeness in Peer-review Texts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22870873 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Donna M Johnson (0000-0003-3490-8343, University of Arizona, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-71 |
| Publication date | 1992-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0142-6001 • E-ISSN: 1477-450X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/applin/13.1.51 |
| OpenAlex | W2003696180 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
This paper reports on an empirical analysis of the forms, strategies, and functions of complimenting in one genre of written discourse. The data base is a set of 51 peer-review texts written in an academic setting. First, analyses are provided of the syntactic and lexical patterns of 256 compliments. These analyses reveal the degree and nature of formulaicity in the compliments. A related discussion of politeness considerations in the use of syntactic framing strategies is also offered. Next, several complimenting discourse strategies used by writers to construct their texts are identified. It was found, for example, that writers exhibited a remarkable regularity in the use of opening compliments. It is argued that writers use complimenting discourse strategies to establish and maintain rapport and to mitigate both global and specific face-threatening acts and that these social purposes help to account for both their frequency and patterning in the texts.
Applied linguistics · Linguistics · Media studies · Politeness · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices
Cortesía e imagen en las preguntas orales del Parlamento español
Guarding the gate politically and politely
Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed
Politeness
Sugaring the pill
“Why are you speaking Chinese so well?”
The diachronic change in linguistic positivity in the academic book reviewing of language studies
Expert statements
Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews
The principal principles of pragmatic inference
Compliment responses among British and Spanish university students
FTAs and Erskine May
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,35 |
| Citation span | 1992 - 2026 (35) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |