Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What makes listening comprehension difficult?

A feature-based machine learning approach to understanding item difficulty

Bibliographic Data

ID22871663
AuthorsHuiying Cai (0000-0002-1784-4408, Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 4080 Literatures, Cultures, and Linguistics Building, 707 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801), Xun Yan (0000-0002-4544-4938, Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 4080 Literatures, Cultures, and Linguistics Building, 707 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801), Ping-Lin Chuang (0000-0003-2907-5324, Duolingo , 5900 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206), Yulin Pan (Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 4080 Literatures, Cultures, and Linguistics Building, 707 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801), Mingyue Huo (Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 4080 Literatures, Cultures, and Linguistics Building, 707 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801)
Year2025
Publication date2025-11-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueApplied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-6001 • E-ISSN: 1477-450X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/applin/amaf079
OpenAlexW4416598152
LanguageEN
References cited27

Understanding what makes second language (L2) listening comprehension difficult is crucial for advancing language learning and assessment. In L2 listening assessment, a key challenge is developing items with targeted difficulty levels. This difficulty can be influenced by textual and acoustic features from different item segments (i.e. stimuli, stems, and options) embedded in a multi-layered structure, along with task-related features. This study explores a feature-based machine learning (ML) approach to predicting difficulty of multiple-choice listening items on a local language proficiency test. We extracted construct-relevant textual and acoustic features from item segments across five dimensions: lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, fluency, pronunciation, and similarities among item segments. Incorporating these features, we compared traditional and mixed-effects ML models for predictive accuracy and interpretability. The best-performing model—a mixed-effects Ridge model with twenty-three features—achieved high accuracy (R2 = 0.860) and showed meaningful feature-difficulty relationships. This study presents methodological innovations for item difficulty modeling and offers practical implications for human- and machine-mediated item development. It also demonstrates potential of incorporating computational linguistics and ML in enhancing L2 listening assessment.

Active listening · Comprehension · Computational linguistics · Key (lock) · Language acquisition · Language proficiency · Listening comprehension · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Language Development and Disorders · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

  • Assessing the Validity of Lexical Diversity Indices Using Direct Judgements

    Kristopher Kyle, Scott A Crossley et al.•Language Assessment Quarterly•2021

  • Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms

    Jessie S Barrot•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2023

  • Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English

    Open Access•Okim Kang, D L Rubin et al.•Modern Language Journal•2010

  • The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (Taales)

    Open Access•Kristopher Kyle, Scott A Crossley et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2018

  • Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment

    Open Access•Geoff Brindley, Helen Slatyer•Language Testing•2002

  • Validation of listening comprehension tests

    Open Access•Elana Shohamy, Ofra Inbar•Language Testing•1991

  • Fairness of using different English accents

    Open Access•Okim Kang, Xun Yan et al.•Language Testing•2024

  • To show or not to show

    Open Access•Kozo Yanagawa, Anthony Green•System•2008

  • Analyzing Discourse Processing Using a Simple Natural Language Processing Tool

    Scott A Crossley, Laura K Allen et al.•Discourse Processes•2014

  • The Effects of Syntactic Simplification and Repetition on Listening Comprehension

    Raoul Cervantes, Glenn Gainer et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1992

  • The Role of Task and Listener Characteristics in Second Language Listening

    Open Access•Tineke Brunfaut, Andrea Révész•TESOL Quarterly•2015

  • Speech Rate and Listening Comprehension

    Roger Griffiths•TESOL Quarterly•1992

  • A Theory of Pitch Accent in English

    Dwight Bolinger, Dwight L Bolinger•WORD•1958

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae