How language divides
Asymmetries in the differentiating power of opinion discourse
Dados Bibliográficos
Polarization is typically conceptualized as increasing distance between opposing attitudes. We argue instead that it unfolds through asymmetries in the group‐differentiating power of opinion language. In public discourse, actors use distinctive linguistic repertoires to signal alignment, mark boundaries, and render opinion landscapes intelligible. Conventional attitude scales estimate the distributions of private belief but cannot capture how these boundaries are enacted in expression or how normative asymmetries shape the visibility of positions. Across three studies of vaccination discourse in South Africa and the United States, combining human coding with machine learning models of natural language, we examine how majority and minority opinions differ in their capacity to differentiate social groups. Consistent with Moscovici's theory of minority influence, minority discourse became more linguistically distinctive—and more effective at separating communities—under politicized conditions, whereas majority discourse was more dispersed and aligned with institutional reporting. In both contexts, linguistic proximity to opinion poles was associated with heightened anger. These findings suggest that polarization is not only divergence in belief but also an asymmetrical process of boundary construction enacted through language.
Discourse analysis · Divergence (linguistics) · Motivated reasoning · Normative · Polarization (electrochemistry) · Power (physics) · Public opinion · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
The Partisan Sort
Asymmetric Politics
How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks
Studies of independence and conformity
Putting the affect into affective polarisation
The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media
Sharing is caring
Social Dominance
The MAD Model of Moral Contagion
How European am I?”
Discursive Social Psychology
Speaker landscapes
When debates break apart
The Effect of Response Categories on Questionnaire Answers
Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action
Social identity emergence in attitude interactions and the identity strengthening effects of cumulative attitude agreement
Alignment and Differentiation
Notes towards a description of Social Representations
Understanding Polarization
The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers
A New Opinion Polarization Index Developed by Integrating Expert Judgments
Human murmuration
Is Polarization a Myth
How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization
Polarization on social media
The Struggle for the Nature of “Prejudice
A Timely Intervention
Political Polarization in the American Public
Affect, Not Ideology
Validating the feeling thermometer as a measure of partisan affect in multi-party systems
On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized
Movements and media
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |