Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) K. Hendy
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
ANO 2021
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Medical Anthropology Quarterly
ISSN 0745-5194
E-ISSN 1548-1387
EDITORA John Wiley and Sons Inc
DOI 10.1111/maq.12548
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 fd87975f1cc6838b41dc5064a5565be8

Resumo

Nonprofit efforts to develop ±3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)—better known as the street drug Ecstasy—as a prescription pharmaceutical provide the opportunity to examine recent theorizations of pharmaceuticals as fluid objects transformed in new informational and material environments. Drawing from ethnographic research, this article interrogates MDMA researchers' own distinction between MDMA and the street drug Ecstasy. While researchers maintain that pure MDMA is distinct from Ecstasy, this article argues that the difference between the two hangs not on a distinction in substance, but on a distinction in safety that must be produced through the trial. This article tracks the production of safety through the inter‐connected work of clinical documents, which manage both which bodies are allowed to absorb the drug and which bodily events count as effects. MDMA's safety emerges from the careful management of relations through these documentary practices.

Ferramentas