Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Practical Considerations for Serving as an Expert Witness for Central American Asylum Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID2289770
AuthorsBrent Metz (0000-0003-4091-2074, University of Kansas, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume46
Issue1
Pages103-106
Publication date2022-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of Anthropological Practice (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2153-957X • E-ISSN: 2153-9588
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/napa.12182
OpenAlexW4210311211
LanguageEN

The decision for academics, especially ethnographers whose contributions involve rapport and friendship, to serve as expert witnesses, particularly for the growing numbers of applicants from northern Central America, should involve ethical and professional considerations. While expert witnesses do not determine the veracity of individual cases, they should at least reflect when people from populations they know are disadvantaged and under various threats call for help. Professionally, academics should ask if they are really "experts" for the cases at hand, the cases are credible, and the number of requests they can handle before compromising other work obligations

Disadvantaged · Ethnography · Expert witness · Friendship · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Witness · Work (physics · Engineering · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae