Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Co-opting Authority and Privatizing Force in Rural Africa

Ensuring Corporate Power over Land and People

Bibliographic Data

ID2291235
AuthorsGearoid Millar (0000-0002-0069-9742, University of Aberdeen, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume83
Issue4
Pages749-771
Publication date2018-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRural Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-0112 • E-ISSN: 1549-0831
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ruso.12203
OpenAlexW2784065087
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited61

Large-scale land investment projects in sub-Saharan Africa have received substantial criticism for their negative local impacts, but few studies discuss specifically their application of corporate power on the ground. This article provides an examination of such application in rural Sierra Leone. The article describes how one corporation both directly and indirectly co-opted authority and privatized force in order to wield power over the land and people. The data illustrate how local authorities and security actors were incentivized to defend the interests of the corporation as opposed to the local communities they supposedly represent and protect. Such processes ensured corporate power not only over the land but also over the local population. The findings, therefore, demand more robust and multidimensional accountability mechanisms to avoid the corporate acquisition of power in rural Africa. Such mechanisms would demand: (1) that investing corporations be more informed about local sociocultural, economic, and political dynamics on the ground; (2) that funders and local governments fund, report on, and enforce more regular, culturally sensitive, and independent assessments of project impacts; and (3) that funders, governments, corporations, and customary elites be held accountable for the negative impacts of such projects by international and national civil society organizations

Accountability · Business · Civil society · Corporation · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Land tenure · Political science · Politics · Population · Sierra leone · Sociology · African studies and sociopolitical issues · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Finance · Law · Mining and Resource Management

  • Peacebuilding Legacy

    Sukanya Podder•Peacebuilding Legacy•2022

  • Plantation assemblages and spaces of contested development in Sierra Leone and Cambodia

    Anne Hennings•Conflict Security and Development•2018

  • A false promise? Regulating land-grabbing and the post-colonial state

    Open Access•Ntina Tzouvala•Leiden Journal of International Law•2019

  • Corporate contentious politics

    Open Access•Ward Berenschot, Ahmad Dhiaulhaq et al.•Political Geography•2024

  • The company is here to do goodness to us

    Open Access•Jogien Bakker, Caitlin Ryan•Environment and Planning A…•2021

  • (Re)negotiating State Authority

    Open Access•Mohamed Sesay•African Studies Review•2024

  • Corporate Repertoires of Control and Performances of Power in a Contested Land Deal in Senegal

    Open Access•Marie Gagné•African Studies Review•2021

  • Sowing Seeds of Sovereignty

    Open Access•Andrew Carter•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2024

  • Hidden Interactions in the Economics of Peace and Conflict

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Economic Anthropology•2020

  • An Ethnographic Approach to Peacebuilding

    Gearoid Millar•Ethnographic Approach to…•2014

  • Localizing transitional justice

    Rosalind Shaw, Lars Waldorf et al.•Localizing Transitional Justice•2010

  • Friction

    Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing•Friction•2005

  • Local Evaluations of Justice through Truth Telling in Sierra Leone

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Human Rights Review•2011

  • Performative memory and re-victimization

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Memory Studies•2014

  • We Have No Voice for That”

    Gearoid Millar•Journal of Human Rights•2015

  • The Rites of the Child

    Susan Shepler•Journal of Human Rights•2005

  • The Challenge of Global Governance of Land Grabbing

    Saturnino M Borra, Jennifer C Franco et al.•Globalizations•2013

  • Land Grabbing as Security Mercantilism in International Relations

    Philip Mcmichael•Globalizations•2013

  • Land Grabs Today

    Sassen, Saskia Sassen•Globalizations•2013

  • Land Grabbing and Global Governance

    Matias E Margulis, Nora Mckeon et al.•Globalizations•2013

  • When a Good Business Model is Not Enough

    Dzodzi Tsikata, Joseph Awetori Yaro•Feminist Economics•2013

  • Land, Gender, and Food Security

    Cheryl R Do, Gale Summerfield et al.•Feminist Economics•2014

  • Land Grabs, Power, and Gender in East and Southern Africa

    Ritu Verma•Feminist Economics•2014

  • Can the Law Secure Women's Rights to Land in Africa? Revisiting Tensions Between Culture and Land Commercialization

    Lyn Ossome•Feminist Economics•2014

  • Other Inhumane Acts’

    Open Access•A S J Park•Social & Legal Studies•2006

  • The interconnected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective

    Open Access•Colin Sage•Journal of Rural Studies•2012

  • A holistic approach to natural resource conflict

    Open Access•J Bond•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • The New Enclosures? Polanyi, international investment law and the global land rush

    Lorenzo Cotula•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • The Global Politics of Water Grabbing

    Jennifer C Franco, Jennifer Franco et al.•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’

    Saturnino M Borras Jr, Saturnino M Borras et al.•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • Investing in peace

    Gearoid Millar•Third World Quarterly•2015

  • Large-scale land deals in Sierra Leone at the intersection of gender and lineage

    Open Access•Caitlin Ryan•Third World Quarterly•2018

  • Land Grabbing, Large- and Small-scale Farming

    Elena Baglioni, Peter Gibbon•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • For whom do local peace processes function? Maintaining control through conflict management

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Cooperation and Conflict•2016

  • Energy Policy and Environmental Possibilities

    Open Access•Hannah Holleman•Rural Sociology•2012

  • Distinguishing Power, Authority & Legitimacy

    Norman Uphoff•Polity•1989

  • Neither Citizen Nor Subject? ‘Lumpen’ Agency and the Legacy of Native Administration in Sierra Leone

    Richard Fanthorpe•African Affairs•2001

  • Global Land Grabs

    M Edelman, Carlos Oya et al.•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • Assessing Local Experiences of Truth-Telling in Sierra Leone

    Gearoid Millar•International Journal of…•2010

  • Between Western theory and local practice

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Conflict Resolution Quarterly•2011

  • Bush path to destruction

    Open Access•Ibrahim Abdullah•The Journal of Modern African…•1998

  • The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Jean-Philippe Platteau, Jean‐philippe Platteau•Development and Change•1996

  • Chinese Land-Based Interventions in Senegal

    Open Access•Lila Buckley•Development and Change•2013

  • Indirect Dispossession

    Open Access•Madeleine Fairbairn•Development and Change•2013

  • The Political Construction of Wasteland

    Open Access•Jennifer Baka•Development and Change•2013

  • Boundless Biofuels? Between Environmental Sustainability and Vulnerability

    Open Access•Arthur P J Mol•Sociologia Ruralis•2007

  • Local experiences of liberal peace

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Journal of Peace Research•2016

  • Governing Global Land Deals

    Open Access•W Wolford, Saturnino M Borras Jr et al.•Development and Change•2013

  • Road Mapping

    Open Access•Liza Grandia•Development and Change•2013

  • Building the Politics Machine

    Open Access•Maggie Dwyer, Michael B Dwyer•Development and Change•2013

  • Land Regularization in Brazil and the Global Land Grab

    Open Access•Gustavo De L T Oliveira•Development and Change•2013

  • Why we fight

    Open Access•Krijn Peters, P Richards•Africa•1998

  • Decentralisation, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry

    Open Access•Jesse Ribot, Jesse C Ribot•Africa•1999

  • The Political Economy of Institutional Landownership

    Open Access•Andrew Gunnoe•Rural Sociology•2014

  • Development by Dispossession

    Open Access•Fouad Makki•Rural Sociology•2014

  • People, Power, and Land

    Open Access•Charles Geisler, Fouad Makki•Rural Sociology•2014

  • Primitive Accumulation, New Enclosures, and Global Land Grabs

    Open Access•Onur Ulas Ince•Rural Sociology•2014

  • Rethinking Land Grab Ontology

    Open Access•Philip Mcmichael•Rural Sociology•2014

  • Knowledge and Control in the Contemporary Land Rush

    Open Access•Gearoid Millar•Journal of Agrarian Change•2016

  • A Theory of Access

    Open Access•Jesse Ribot, Jesse C Ribot et al.•Rural Sociology•2003

  • The politics of evidence

    Open Access•I Scoones, R Hall et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • Messy hectares

    M Edelman•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • Methodological reflections on 'land grab' databases and the 'land grab' literature 'rush

    Carlos Oya•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • The new enclosures

    Ben White, Saturnino M Borras Jr et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • Gendered experiences of dispossession

    Julia, Julia Julia et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • Green Grabbing

    Open Access•James Fairhead, Macedward Leach et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • How not to think of land-grabbing

    Olivier De Schutter•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2011

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,13
Citation span2018 - 2024 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae