Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Plant Science and Intellectual Property Protections in Taiwan

Bibliographic Data

ID2291399
AuthorsRick Welsh (0000-0002-8169-9380, Department of Nutrition & Food Studies Syracuse University, corresponding author), Yuju Chien (Department of Sociology National Taiwan University), Adrianne Traub (Department of Nutrition and Food Studies Syracuse University), Leland Glenna (0000-0003-0112-9140, AESE Department Pennsylvania State University)
Year2021
Volume86
Issue4
Pages864-885
Publication date2021-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRural Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-0112 • E-ISSN: 1549-0831
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ruso.12369
OpenAlexW3128956813
LanguageEN
References cited43

Beginning in 1980, and due to a number of significant court decisions, legislative initiatives and international economic agreements, there has been an increase in the importance and use of intellectual property mechanisms, such as patents, in protecting biological materials, including seeds and engineered crop traits. The trend originated in the U.S. but has since diffused to OECD and non-OECD nations. A parallel but related set of policies designed to promote the patenting of university and federally funded research discoveries has also become evident in the U.S. and globally. In this paper, we discuss the trend toward more restrictive IP protections in agriculture through national-level policies and international economic agreements especially for new plant varieties. We then present the case of plant science research in Taiwan, including interviews with 15 plant scientists, to illustrate how transnational trends can impact and interact with national level policies and practices. And, how research scientists can play critical roles in furthering or retarding the progression of the proprietary research model in plant science

Agriculture · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Intellectual property · International trade · Legislature · Political science · Science policy · Innovation Policy and RD · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Public Administration

  • Against Intellectual Monopoly

    Open Access•Michele Boldrin, David K Levine•Against Intellectual Monopoly•2008

  • Creating the Market University

    Elizabeth Popp Berman•Creating the Market University•2012

  • Academic Entrepreneurship

    Scott Shane•Academic Entrepreneurship•2004

  • The Enigma of Severe Mental Illness

    Maria Nyström, Karin Dahlberg et al.•Issues in Mental Health Nursing•2002

  • Academic Capitalism and the New Economy

    Sheila Slaughter, Gary Rhoades•Academic capitalism and the new…•2009

  • AFHVS 2017 presidential address

    Open Access•Leland Glenna•Agriculture and Human Values•2017

  • Insight into weak enforcement of intellectual property rights in China

    Open Access•Qing Cao•Technology in Society•2014

  • Intellectual Property and Agricultural Science and Innovation in Germany and the United States

    Open Access•Barbara Brandl, Leland L Glenna et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • Academic Entrepreneurship and Exchange of Scientific Resources

    Open Access•Sotaro Shibayama, John P Walsh et al.•American Sociological Review•2012

  • Seeds of Change

    Open Access•Michael Mascarenhas, Lawrence Busch•Sociologia Ruralis•2006

  • Intellectual Property, Scientific Independence, and the Efficacy and Environmental Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops

    Open Access•Leland L Glenna, Leland Glenna et al.•Rural Sociology•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae