Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Amy Adamczyk , Emily Greene‐Colozzi , Senahan Kiyal Keles , Aida Murati
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) The City University of New York, John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center (CUNY), John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY)
ANO 2022
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociological Inquiry
ISSN 0038-0245
E-ISSN 1475-682X
EDITORA Sage Publications (United States)
DOI 10.1111/soin.12484
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

Since Donald Trump's political campaign, Americans have appeared increasingly divided over public opinion issues and U.S. policies with the media seemingly reflecting these divisions. One of Trump's early initiatives was the 'Muslim ban,' which restricted visitors from seven Muslim‐majority countries. Focusing on the portrayal of Muslims in over 900 hand‐coded articles, our study uses multilevel modeling techniques to examine how newspapers changed their frames and claimsmakers in discussions about Muslims before and after Trump was elected. After the election, newspapers were more likely to include government claimsmakers and an immigration frame and were less likely to mention a radical terrorist leader or portray Muslims as violent. Trump's election and the ban may have ushered in a more sympathetic view of Muslims with more articles focused on them as victims of violence and negative expressions. Across counties, states, and newspapers and between the national versus local presses, we find almost no significant differences in how Muslims were portrayed.

Ferramentas