Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comment on Rust et al.

Human–Carnivore Conflict in Namibia Is Not Simply About Black and White

Bibliographic Data

ID22934173
AuthorsGail C Potgieter (0000-0001-5345-088X, corresponding author), Florian Johannes Weise (CLAWS Conservancy, Worcester, MA, USA), Bettina Wachter (0000-0002-0414-2298, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany), Jörg Melzheimer (Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany), Ingrid Wiesel (Brown Hyena Research Project, Lüderitz, Namibia), Ken Stratford (0000-0001-7585-982X, Ongava Research Centre, Outjo, Namibia)
Year2017
Volume30
Issue10
Pages1299-1303
Publication date2017-10-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociety & Natural Resources (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-1920 • E-ISSN: 1521-0723
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08941920.2017.1283077
OpenAlexW2588863416
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited12

Carnivore conservationists agree that addressing the socioeconomic needs of people is critical to human-carnivore conflict mitigation. We therefore welcome studies that encompass complex social and cultural factors that affect the severity of human-carnivore conflict on Namibian farmlands. However, we contend that the recent study by Rust et al. (2016 Rust, N. A., J. Tzanopoulos, T. Humle, and D. C. MacMillan. 2016. Why has human–carnivore conflict not been resolved in Namibia? Society & Natural Resources 29 (9):1079–94. doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1150544[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) was poorly designed, used inappropriate sampling methods, lacked quantitative information on their qualitative results, and ultimately produced unsupported conclusions about the role of historic apartheid and current racism in exacerbating human-carnivore conflict in Namibia. We outline our concerns regarding the methods used, and demonstrate that the conclusions drawn by Rust et al. were not supported by their data.

Biology · Carnivore · Ethnology · Geography · Political science · Politics · Social conflict · Sociology · Ecology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Law · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

  • Illegal harvest, use, and trade in Temminck’s pangolins by communities adjacent to Ruaha National Park, Tanzania

    Charles Peter Mgeni, Rose Peter Kicheleri et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  • Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality

    Niki Rust, Amber Abrams et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2017

  • Complexities of conflict

    Open Access•Amy Dickman, A J Dickman•Animal Conservation•2010

  • Creating Coexistence between Humans and Wildlife

    Francine Madden•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2004

  • Why Has Human–Carnivore Conflict Not Been Resolved in Namibia

    Open Access•Niki Rust, Joseph Tzanopoulos et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2016

  • The Poacher

    Open Access•Delmos J Jones, D J V Jones•The Historical Journal•1979

  • Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling

    Open Access•M J Salganik, Douglas D Heckathorn•Sociological Methodology•2004

  • Respondent-Driven Sampling II

    Douglas D Heckathorn•Social Problems•2002

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.22
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae