Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A survey on perceived medication guide reading and comprehension ease among US adults

Bibliographic Data

ID22944057
AuthorsPaul R Jones (0000-0001-9126-7269, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), Jonas Santiago (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), Bryon M Pearsall (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), Dan-My Chu (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), Carolyn Wolff (0000-0003-0621-6526, Office of Economics and Analysis, Office of Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs, Office of the Commissioner, FDA , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 , USA), Aaron Kearsley (0000-0001-5020-2266, Office of Economics and Analysis, Office of Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs, Office of the Commissioner, FDA , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 , USA)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue1
Publication date2024-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Promotion International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/heapro/daad190
PMID38386901
OpenAlexW4392089932
LanguageEN
References cited25

Medication guides (MGs) provide patients with important information about certain prescription drugs to help them take these drugs safely. We surveyed US residents about their perceptions of MG readability and understandability. We randomly sampled 5204 US residents (age 18+) from Ipsos’s KnowledgePanel to complete a two-part survey. Only respondents who reported receiving an MG with their prescription drugs (n = 3852) completed part 2, which included two key items: How easy to [(1)read/(2)understand] are the MGs that you have received from a pharmacy along with your prescription medicines? (1 = Very easy, 5 = Very difficult; reverse-coded). Health literacy (HL) and demographic data were also collected. After weighting our data, we found that 85% of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived this information as ‘very easy’ (27.3%), ‘somewhat easy’ (28.3%) or ‘about average’ (29.3%) to read. Eighty-seven percent of respondents who reported receiving an MG perceived it as ‘very easy’ (27.6%), ‘somewhat easy’ (30.2%) or ‘about average’ (29.5%) to understand. ANOVAs revealed higher average perceived MG reading and comprehension ease scores among respondents presumed to have adequate versus inadequate HL (ps ≤ 0.0006). Younger or less-educated respondents and non-Hispanic Blacks perceived MGs as easier to read and understand, on average, than their counterparts (ps ≤ 0.0001). Many of these relationships remained intact in models predicting perceived MG reading and comprehension ease (ps ≤ 0.001). Adjusted R2 values across models were small, however (≤0.06). Our findings suggest most US residents (18+) who received MGs perceived them to be ‘about average’ to ‘very easy’ to read and understand.

Comprehension · Family medicine · Health care · Health literacy · Literacy · Medical prescription · Numeracy · Perception · Readability · Reading (process) · Usability · Computer Science · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Nursing · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Pharmacy · Psychology · Respiratory and Cough-Related Research · Gerontology

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • Validation of Screening Questions for Limited Health Literacy in a Large VA Outpatient Population

    Open Access•Lisa D Chew, Joan M Griffin et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2008

  • Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy

    Open Access•David W Baker, Malcolm V Williams et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•1999

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-centered Strategies to Improve FDA Medication Guides

    Michael S Wolf, Stacy Cooper Bailey et al.•Medical Care•2014

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • A self-presentational view of social phenomena

    Roy F Baumeister•Psychological Bulletin•1982

  • Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences

    Paul Hanly Furfey, Leon Festinger et al.•The American Catholic Sociological…•1954

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae