The Decide evidence to recommendation framework adapted to the public health field in Sweden
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22944210 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karin Guldbrandsson (Public Health Agency of Sweden, corresponding author), Nils Stenström (National Board of Health and Welfare), Regina Winzer (0000-0002-4549-0504, Public Health Agency of Sweden) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 749-754 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Promotion International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapro/dav060 |
| PMID | 26082448 |
| OpenAlex | W2340913525 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Organizations worldwide compile results from scientific studies, and grade the evidence of interventions, in order to assist policy makers. However, quality of evidence alone is seldom sufficient to make a recommendation. The Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE) framework aims to facilitate decision making and to improve dissemination and implementation of recommendations in the healthcare and public health sector. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the DECIDE framework is applicable in the public health field in Sweden. The DECIDE framework was presented and discussed in interviews with stakeholders and governmental organizations and tested in panels. Content analyses were performed. In general, the informants were positive to the DECIDE framework. However, two questions, the first regarding individual autonomy and the second regarding method sustainability, were by the stakeholders felt to be missing in the framework. The importance of the composition of the DECIDE stakeholder panel was lifted by the informants, as was the significant role of the chair. Further, the informants raised concerns about the general lack of research evidence based on RCT design regarding universal methods in the public health sector. Finally, the local, regional and national levels' responsibility for dissemination and implementation of recommendations were lifted by the informants. The DECIDE framework might be useful as a tool for dissemination and implementation of recommendations in the public health field in Sweden. Important questions for further research are whether these findings are suitable for other public health topics and in other public health settings.
Alternative medicine · Autonomy · Business · Evidence-based practice · Health care · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Public sector · Stakeholder · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |