How is health equity considered in scale-up guidance? A scoping review of process models for scaling public health innovations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22945095
AutoresSarah Marshall (0000-0002-7820-2994, The University of Sydney), Ekaterina Frolov (The University of Sydney), Roberta de Carvalho Corôa (0000-0002-4778-1890, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval , 2325 Rue de l’Université, Québec, G1V 0A6 ,), Harriet Koorts (0000-0003-1303-6064, Deakin University), Andrew Milat (0000-0003-3126-3463, The University of Sydney), Karen Lee (0000-0002-9640-221X, The University of Sydney, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen41
Número3
Fecha de publicación2026-05-05
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Promotion International (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/heapro/daag059
PMID42159190
OpenAlexW7161842425
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas73

Scale-up guidance is valuable to guiding efforts to increase the reach and impact of public health innovations. Health equity, that is, ‘the absence of systematic disparities in health between groups’ is often a motivator for scale-up though it is unclear how ‘equity’ is considered within existing scale-up guidance. This scoping review aimed to identify the equity considerations articulated within existing scale-up models. Five databases and grey literature were systematically searched. Articles were included if they explicitly developed a model/framework to guide the process of scaling-up public health innovations. Search results were screened, and content analysis was undertaken. Of the 29 scale-up models identified, 24 included mention of equity terms or equity-related characteristics, however there was variation in how equity was conceptualized and the extent to which it was incorporated. Seven domains were developed to describe how equity was considered: (1) Equity acknowledged in the supporting text as an important factor when scaling-up; (2) Equity positioned as a guiding principle or cross-cutting theme; (3) Equity considered in scalable innovation design or intended population; (4) Equity incorporated into scale-up planning and strategy development; (5) Equity assessed within context and environment assessments; (6) Equity factored into resource allocation and workforce planning; (7) Equity considered in stakeholder engagement. There was considerable variation in how equity was considered which offers opportunities for enhancements. Existing and future scale-up models can be strengthened by applying a more consistent equity focus, and providing more comprehensive, actionable guidance for undertaking equitable scaling of public health innovations.

Context (archaeology) · Equity (law) · Equity capital markets · Equity risk · Health equity · Public health · Stakeholder · Workforce · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Public Health Policies and Education