Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID22945353
AuthorsRachel Sinanan (0000-0002-6381-6977, Federation University, corresponding author), George Van Doorn (0000-0001-7311-7099, Federation University), C Browning (0000-0001-6739-0152, Federation University), Britt Klein (0000-0003-2912-8043, Federation University), Cameron Foale (0000-0003-2537-0326, Federation University)
Year2026
Volume41
Issue3
Publication date2026-05-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Promotion International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/heapro/daag080
PMID42261765
OpenAlexW7164042571
LanguageEN
References cited92

Digital health literacy is increasingly vital for equitable healthcare, yet adults aged 45+ may face age-related and psychosocial barriers that limit digital engagement. Interventions targeting these barriers are crucial. This review mapped the design and effectiveness of current digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years, assessing how they addressed biological, psychological, and social (biopsychosocial) dimensions and key outcomes. The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Five databases were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2025. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria, comprising randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, qualitative research, and systematic and scoping reviews. Data were synthesized and thematically mapped against biopsychosocial dimensions and effectiveness outcomes, including competence, critical thinking, empowerment, sustained engagement, and health outcomes. Most interventions were associated with improvements in digital skills, confidence, and self-efficacy, particularly when delivered face-to-face, in small groups, or through blended formats. However, most focused on psychological factors, with biological and social dimensions addressed inconsistently. Only one study incorporated all three biopsychosocial dimensions, and none assessed all effectiveness outcomes simultaneously. There was limited evidence for improvements in sustained engagement, critical thinking, and longer-term health outcomes following intervention. Digital health literacy interventions for adults aged 45+ years may therefore benefit from extending beyond a focus on technical skills to address the broader range of age-related biopsychosocial barriers. In this context, a biopsychosocial–digital framework appears to offer a more comprehensive foundation for the design and evaluation of interventions aimed at supporting meaningful and sustained health outcomes.

Biopsychosocial model · Digital health · Focus group · Health literacy · Inclusion (mineral) · Intervention (counseling) · Program evaluation · Psychological intervention · Psychosocial · Systematic review · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Technology Use by Older Adults

  • Trajectories of normal cognitive aging.

    Open Access•Timothy A Salthouse•Psychology and Aging•2019

  • Prisma2020

    Open Access•Neal Haddaway, Matthew J Page et al.•Campbell Systematic Reviews•2022

  • eHeals

    Open Access•Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner•Journal of Medical Internet…•2006

  • The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials

    Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone et al.•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

  • The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement

    Open Access•Heather L O'Brien, Elaine G Toms•Journal of the Association for…•2010

  • The Impact of Age on Cognition

    Daniel Murman, Daniel L Murman•Seminars in Hearing•2015

  • What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis

    Open Access•Karen M van Leeuwen, Miriam S van Loon et al.•PLoS ONE•2019

  • Summarizing systematic reviews

    Edoardo Aromataris, Ritin Fernandez et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • The Information‐Motivation‐Behavioral Skills Model

    William A Fisher, Jeffrey D Fisher et al.•Social Psychological Foundations…•2003

  • Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument

    Open Access•Rosalie van der Vaart, Constance H C Drossaert•Journal of Medical Internet…•2017

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Kathryn Skivington, Lynsay Matthews et al.•BMJ•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Health literacy as a public health goal

    Open Access•Don Nutbeam•Health Promotion International•2000

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • The Need for a New Medical Model

    Open Access•George L Engel•Science•1977

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe et al.•BMJ•2008

  • Digital learning in the 21st century

    Open Access•Yumei Zou, Florence Kuek et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Research progress on digital health literacy of older adults

    Open Access•Xinxin Wang, Wei Luan•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Research on enhancing digital competence among the elderly from the perspective of social capital

    Open Access•Wenjing Xia, Mo Chen et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • A systematic review of digital literacy in lifelong learning for older adults

    Open Access•Lingran Xu, Davy Tsz Kit Ng et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2025

  • Examining the role of Filipino elderly attitudes toward computer and internet on their behavioral intention for telehealth participation

    Allan B De Guzman, Michael Joseph S Diño•Educational Gerontology•2020

  • Promoting healthy aging through intergenerational exchange and digital empowerment

    Open Access•Giulia Cossu, Stefano Lorrai et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • EHealth Literacy

    Open Access•Roberta Bevilacqua, Stefano Strano et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Applying the information–motivation–behavioral model to explore the influencing factors of self-management behavior among osteoporosis patients

    Open Access•Lhakpa Tsamlag, Huwen Wang et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Bridging the Digital Divide for Older Adults via Intergenerational Mentor-Up

    Open Access•Othelia Eun-Kyoung Lee, Othelia Eunkyoung Lee et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2018

  • But at the age of 85? Forget it!”

    Open Access•Hanna Köttl, Vera Gallistl et al.•Journal of Aging Studies•2021

  • That's for old so and so's!’

    Open Access•Arlene Astell, Arlene J Astell et al.•Ageing and Society•2020

  • Factors Influencing Seniors' Anxiety in Using ICT

    Open Access•Mike Reid, Torgeir Aleti et al.•Social Sciences•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae