Developing structures to support researchers studying health-harming industries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22945458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hannah Pitt (0000-0002-4259-6186, Deakin University, corresponding author), Sabrina Lynette Thomas (0000-0003-1427-7775, Deakin University), Simone Mccarthy (0000-0003-2671-3511, Deakin University), May Ci Van Schalkwyk (0000-0003-2210-2289, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London), Mark Petticrew (0000-0002-6378-5517, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Melanie Randle (0000-0001-9129-1701, University of Wollongong), Mike Daube (0000-0002-3479-2785, Curtin University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Promotion International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapro/daae174 |
| PMID | 39578223 |
| OpenAlex | W4404631442 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 50 |
It is well-documented that health-harming industries and the groups they fund use a range of tactics that seek to interfere with academic research. With the development of scholarship relating to the Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH), an increasing number of public health researchers are working to examine the activities of health-harming industries and the impacts they have on health and equity. However, there has been limited research investigating the experiences of these researchers and the range of strategies that could be used to support them. This qualitative interpretivist study involved 10 online focus groups with 28 public health researchers (ranging from PhD students to emeritus professors) in Australia and the UK. The researchers worked on issues related to the alcohol, gambling, tobacco or ultra-processed food industries. Participants outlined a range of personal and professional risks relating to their research, including social media attacks, complaints to university personnel and funders, attempts to discredit their research, legal threats and freedom of information requests. Some described the impacts this had on their overall well-being, and even on their family life. They commented that current university systems and structures to support them were variable and could differ between individuals within institutions. This often left researchers feeling isolated and unsupported. Universities should recognize the risks to researchers working on issues relating to health-harming industries. They should proactively develop strategies and resources to inform and support researchers to conduct research that is important for public health and equity.
Business · Equity (law) · Feeling · Focus group · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Scholarship · Sociology · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity and Health Practices · Psychology · Public Health Policies and Education · Social Psychology
Conflicts of interest in public health research and publications
Health Promotion International
Tobacco control advocates as human rights defenders
Do alcohol industry-funded organisations act to correct misinformation? A qualitative study of pregnancy and infant health content following independent analysis
Threats and humiliation at the workplace and mental health among environmental scientists - a cross-sectional study
Qualitative and quantitative methods
Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health
Thematic Analysis
‘You can’t really separate these risks, our environment, our animals and us’
Dark patterns, dark nudges, sludge and misinformation
Agnogenic practices and corporate political strategy
The symbolic consumption processes associated with ‘low-calorie’ and ‘low-sugar’ alcohol products and Australian women
Insights into the Belgian gambling advertising ban
Protecting children and young people from contemporary marketing for gambling
Children, young people and the Commercial Determinants of Health
Women and the commercial determinants of health
“They try to suppress us, but we should be louder”
Advocacy counterstrategies to tobacco industry interference in policymaking
The last line of marketing’
To be honest, I’m really scared’
The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda
Protecting the power to pollute
Better poison is the cure? Critically examining fossil fuel companies, climate change framing, and corporate sustainability reports
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |