Optimism, pessimism, and communication behavior in response to an earthquake prediction

Bibliographic Data

ID22948002
AuthorsL Erwin Atwood (0009-0003-7155-8386, College of Communications at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park, PA, corresponding author), Ann Marie Major (0000-0003-3780-1066, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume9
Issue4
Pages417-431
Publication date2000-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/305
OpenAlexW1881969816
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited25

This analysis examines the public response to the 1990 Iben Browning earthquake prediction within the framework of social comparisons theory, which provides a context for examining people's beliefs about their own vulnerability compared with their beliefs about the vulnerability of most other people. Social comparisons do influence people's response to threat. Pessimistic respondents believed they were at greater risk than others and were more likely to believe the prediction. Optimistic respondents were less likely than pessimists to seek information, and their lack of information about the risk may have led to denial of the threat. When beliefs about vulnerability were compared in terms of death, serious injury, and property damage, only 57 percent of the respondents fell into the same grouping of optimist, pessimist, and realist in both analyses. These shifts in group membership provide support for the assertion that beliefs about vulnerability change in response to situational contingencies.

Assertion · Computer security · Context (archaeology) · Denial · Epistemology · Geography · Optimism · Pessimism · Situational ethics · Vulnerability (computing) · Disaster Management and Resilience · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub