Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) D. Zeitlyn
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Oxford School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography
ANO 2012
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Annual Review of Anthropology
ISSN 0084-6570
E-ISSN 1545-4290
EDITORA Publisher 15279
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145721
CITAÇÕES 43
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 57001e609e37a69661a51cc11ffb62f6

Resumo

Derrida and Foucault provide key starting points to understanding archives. They see archives as hegemonic, characterizing ways of thought, modes of colonization, and the control of citizens. However, they also make clear that archives can be read subversively. With patience, counter-readings allow the excavation of the voices (sometimes names) of subaltern and otherwise suppressed others from the archive. By reading along and across the archival grain, researchers can follow the development of ideas and processes across historical periods. Archives can be seen as orphanages, containing surrogates of performances. Archives (paper and digital) also provide access to the results of anthropological research in ways mandated by ethics codes, but these are subject to controversy. What sorts of consent and what sorts of anonymization should be provided? Archives run by the groups traditionally studied by anthropologists provide models of radical archives that are very different from those conceived of by traditional archivists.Read a French translation of this article.

Ferramentas