Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Eduardo G. Neves , Michael J. Heckenberger
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-070, Brazil;, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA;
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Annual Review of Anthropology
ISSN 0084-6570
E-ISSN 1545-4290
EDITORA Publisher 15279
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011057
CITAÇÕES 5
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 a4e97f9239c2426df37cb1217aa79708

Resumo

The Amazon basin is accepted as an independent center of plant domestication in the world. A variety of important plants were domesticated in the Amazon and its surroundings; however, the majority of plants cultivated today in the Amazon are not domesticated, if this descriptor is understood to convey substantial genetic and phenotypic divergence from wild varieties or species. Rather, many domesticates are trees and tubers that occupy an intermediate stage between wild and domesticated, which seems to be a prevailing pattern since at least the middle Holocene, 6,000 years ago. Likewise, basin-wide inventories of trees show a remarkable pattern where a few species, called hyperdominant, are overrepresented in the record, including many varieties that are economically and symbolically important to traditional societies. Cultivation practices among indigenous groups in the Amazon are embedded in other dimensions of meaning that go beyond subsistence, and such entanglement between nature and culture has long been noticed at the conceptual level by anthropologists. This principle manifests itself in ancient and dynamic practices of landscape construction and transformation, which are seriously threatened today by the risks posed by economic development and climate change to Amazonian traditional societies and biomes.

Ferramentas