Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Colin P. Groves
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Australian National University, Dept. of Gender, Media and Cultural Studies
ANO 2014
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Annual Review of Anthropology
ISSN 0084-6570
E-ISSN 1545-4290
EDITORA Publisher 15279
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030232
CITAÇÕES 4
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 55928992dce4bfac2b8e3d9722ad788a

Resumo

This article reviews changes in primate taxonomy, especially those pertaining to the meaning of the term species, since its inception two and a half centuries ago. Despite continuing discoveries and the involvement of competent practitioners, the adoption of the polytypic species concept, especially underpinned by the biological species concept, ensured that primate taxonomy was in a sorry state by the middle of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, a gradual rethinking of the nature of species took place, and many different species concepts were proposed. The phylogenetic species concept has been widely adopted over the past ∼20 years, sustained by a gradual realization that species are evolutionary lineages. This review provides examples of how the old way of thinking about species hampered our understanding of primate biodiversity and of how the phylogenetic species concept (or the diagnosability criterion under the general lineage concept) has clarified matters, opening them up for discussion. The adoption of this evolutionary view of species has implications for conservation, particularly because it increases recognition of biodiversity.

Ferramentas