Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Abascal , Delia Baldassarri
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology and Medicine New York University College of Dentistry New York 10010
ANO 2017
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Annual Review of Sociology
ISSN 0360-0572
E-ISSN 1545-2115
EDITORA Publisher 15279
DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112445
CITAÇÕES 22
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 b55ee5029f33fb91b44828f7dc1173f0

Resumo

Using field experiments, scholars can identify causal effects via randomization while studying people and groups in their naturally occurring contexts. In light of renewed interest in field experimental methods, this review covers a wide range of field experiments from across the social sciences, with an eye to those that adopt virtuous practices, including unobtrusive measurement, naturalistic interventions, attention to realistic outcomes and consequential behaviors, and application to diverse samples and settings. The review covers four broad research areas of substantive and policy interest: first, randomized controlled trials, with a focus on policy interventions in economic development, poverty reduction, and education; second, experiments on the role that norms, motivations, and incentives play in shaping behavior; third, experiments on political mobilization, social influence, and institutional effects; and fourth, experiments on prejudice and discrimination. We discuss methodological issues concerning generalizability and scalability as well as ethical issues related to field experimental methods. We conclude by arguing that field experiments are well equipped to advance the kind of middle-range theorizing that sociologists value.

Ferramentas