Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) R.M. Marsh
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
ANO 2014
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Comparative Sociology
ISSN 1569-1322
E-ISSN 1569-1330
EDITORA Publisher 51
DOI 10.1163/15691330-12341311
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 5008abf353f1e092d180e9d2345eb472

Resumo

Contrary to the pronouncements of Wallerstein, Alexander and others, modernization theory is far from dead. Publications on modernization theory have increased in number during each successive five-year period since 1970. I distinguish between modernization theory 'then' – its formative period from 1949 to 1979, and 'now' the period since the 1990s. Two main things have happened to the theory. First, some research findings in diverse sub-fields continue to vary with, and be explained by, societies' level of modernization, thereby confirming the original modernization paradigm. Second, when other researchers discovered anomalies that could not be explained within the original theory, they did not abandon the theory. Instead, they creatively extended it in new directions that could account for the anomalies, using such concepts as reflexive modernization, risk society, first and second modernity, ecological modernization, evolutionary theory, values modernization, multiple modernities, and global modernity.

Ferramentas