Beyond the Happy Consensus about Democratic Elitism
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | 1Political Science, Eötvös University, 1-3 Egyetem tér, Budapest 1053, Hungary |
ANO | 2009 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Comparative Sociology |
ISSN | 1569-1322 |
E-ISSN | 1569-1330 |
EDITORA | Brill Academic Publishers |
DOI | 10.1163/156913309x447576 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
45d583540f294194022f9d09c18367b1
|
Resumo
A growing number of studies assign elites and leaders a larger role than democratic elitism assumes. Democratic elitism is not a coherent theory because it papers over three quite distinct models of political representation and democratic control: Robert Dahl's mandate model; the accountability model associated chiefly with John Plamenatz; and the authorization model set forth by Adam Przeworski and colleagues. This last model, wherein elites and leaders conceptualize and present voters' choices, best captures elite-voter relations in today's democracies. This authorization model is decidedly pessimistic about controlling elites and leaders in a democracy, but it is nonetheless compatible with a skeptical reading of Schumpeter.