Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) András Körösényi
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) 1Political Science, Eötvös University, 1-3 Egyetem tér, Budapest 1053, Hungary
ANO 2009
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Comparative Sociology
ISSN 1569-1322
E-ISSN 1569-1330
EDITORA Brill Academic Publishers
DOI 10.1163/156913309x447576
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 45d583540f294194022f9d09c18367b1

Resumo

A growing number of studies assign elites and leaders a larger role than democratic elitism assumes. Democratic elitism is not a coherent theory because it papers over three quite distinct models of political representation and democratic control: Robert Dahl's mandate model; the accountability model associated chiefly with John Plamenatz; and the authorization model set forth by Adam Przeworski and colleagues. This last model, wherein elites and leaders conceptualize and present voters' choices, best captures elite-voter relations in today's democracies. This authorization model is decidedly pessimistic about controlling elites and leaders in a democracy, but it is nonetheless compatible with a skeptical reading of Schumpeter.

Ferramentas