Assumptions of the Dialectical Method

Bibliographic Data

ID2299773
AuthorsPaul Paolucci (Eastern Kentucky University), Paul B Paolucci (Eastern Kentucky University, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume27
Issue3
Pages116-146
Publication date2001-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0896-9205 • E-ISSN: 1569-1632
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/08969205010270030601
OpenAlexW1988936137
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited20

Marx employed a wide array of analytical tools and strategies. However, how the elements of his approach across its range are related to one another was left rather undeveloped by him and Engel's contributions have done little to clear up subsequent confusions. Marx also considered that his science compared well in meeting the basic criteria of sound method. All scientific methods share the fact that they must start with a series of assumptions before data gathering commences. The ongoing debates over Marx's dialectical method would be wise to clear up the assumptions with which Marx worked as he gathered and analyzed his data. Toward that end, Marx's approach to “totality”, “abstraction”, “internal relations”, “necessity versus contingency”, assumptions about individuals and society, his approach to essentialism, materialism versus idealism, functionalism, organicism, and the dynamic character of social relations are examined

Contingency · Dialectic · Economics · Epistemology · Essentialism · Historical materialism · Idealism · Marxist philosophy · Materialism · Political science · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Structural functionalism · Appalachian Studies and Mathematics · Critical Realism in Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Diverse Scientific and Engineering Research · History and advancements in chemistry · Law · Philosophy · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub