Stepping-stone solidarity
The normative foundation of the social investment welfare state
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2301458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Azizjon Bagadirov (0000-0001-6541-9628, European University Institute, corresponding author), Anton Hemerijck (0000-0001-8695-1250, European University Institute), Pablo Puertas Roig (0000-0002-1919-316X, European University Institute) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 476-492 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Sociologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6993 • E-ISSN: 1502-3869 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00016993251319682 |
| OpenAlex | W4408455494 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 42 |
In this article, we explore the normative foundations of the social investment welfare state. Social investment welfare enhances ex ante individuals' opportunities and capabilities to resolve the social risks typical of post-industrial societies - via early childhood education and care, vocational training over the life course, active-labour-market capacity-building and policies for work-life balance, such as paid parental leave, lifelong learning and long-term care. Social investment transcends, while not replacing, the compensatory rationale of mid-20th-century social security. We begin by lamenting the prolonged disconnect between social policy research and normative political theory since the 1990s, which is worrisome against the background of significant welfare state change. We address the shortcomings of a purely Rawlsian-distributive reconstruction of the social investment policy turn, while rejecting the 'luck egalitarian' interpretation and its tacit conflation with Third Way welfare reform. Our normative framework for social investment takes heed of Elizabeth Anderson's relational understanding of justice and work by Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit on 'secure' capabilities and 'fertile' functionings, which builds on Amartya Sen's critique of John Rawls. Finally, we delineate our concept of stepping-stone solidarity as the normative anchor of social investment welfare
Economics · Foundation (evidence · Investment (military · Market economy · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Social solidarity · Social Welfare · Sociology · Solidarity · State (computer science · Welfare · Welfare state · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Mathematics · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The methodology of the social sciences
The economics of the welfare state
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Losing ground
The third way
Governing the Commons
Capitalism and Freedom
What Is the Point of Equality?
Citizenship and Social Class
A Framework for Social Investment Strategies
Why We Need a New Welfare State
The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe
A Theory of Justice
Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos Revisited
Changing Welfare States
How Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks?
Sovereign Virtue
Reasons for Welfare
Just Institutions Matter
New Risks, New Welfare
On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice
Welfare, Work Requirements, and Dependant‐Care
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
The Origins of Active Social Policy
Disadvantage
The Uses of Social Investment
In It Together
Inequality Reexamined
Contemporary European Welfare State Transformations and the Risk of Erosion of Social Rights
Welfare without the Welfare State”
Diffusing Ideas for After Neoliberalism
Evicted. Poverty and profit in the American city
Liberalism and Social Theory after John Rawls
The G reat R ecession and Welfare State Reform
Public demand for social investment
What is Egalitrianism
The future of the social investment state
American citizenship
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |