Scientification of politics or politicisation of science? Parliamentary committee hearings on the Finnish alcohol policy reforms in 1994 and 2017 as epistemic work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2301460 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anu Katainen (0000-0002-7624-2677, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, corresponding author), Jukka Syväterä (0000-0001-5387-667X, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland), Josefin Westermarck (University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland), Katariina Warpenius (0009-0000-8541-4699, The National Institute of Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 180-197 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Sociologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6993 • E-ISSN: 1502-3869 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00016993251322875 |
| OpenAlex | W4408003071 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 37 |
The study examined how alcohol policy stakeholders use research evidence to influence legislation and how the role of evidence and scientific expertise has changed over the past three decades in parliamentary alcohol policy consultations in Finland. The data consisted of parliamentary committee hearings on the comprehensive Alcohol Act reforms of 1994 and 2017. The analysis focused on the statements made by experts representing corporate interests, non-governmental organisations and research. The findings indicate the growing importance of science in the ways alcohol policies are influenced during the final stages of the law-making process. Researchers are being heard more frequently, and referencing research evidence has become a significant part of the epistemic work by which various stakeholders in the alcohol policy domain attempt to influence decision-makers. However, the scientification of policy debate does not necessarily indicate an increasing authority of science in determining policy outcomes. The demand for evidence appears to signal a shift in discourse rather than a change in the practice of parliamentary decision-making. Moreover, the consolidation of the ideal of evidence-based policymaking seems to be accompanied by shifting ways in which scientific experts are used - trending towards a legitimising function and an interest-based orientation
Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Work (physics · Health Policy Implementation Science · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Public Administration · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Is research from government agencies more favored by policymakers? Empirical evidence from a scientometric analysis
The rhetorical functions of invoking experts in legislative debates over social policy in Finland
An Engine of Growth or a Public Burden? Economic Knowledge and Expertise in Finnish Parliamentary Discourse on Social Policy, 1960–2020
Shaping reform
The fifth branch
The Paradox of Scientific Authority
Scientific expertise and political accountability
Science in the modern world polity
Strategies for engaging policy stakeholders to translate research knowledge into practice more effectively
The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge
The Honest Broker
Epistemic governance
The moral authority of science
Reconsidering evidence-based policy
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Hoisted with our own petard’
Evidence and policy
Epistemic Governance
Business interests, public interests, and experts in parliamentary committees
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Interest Group Strategies
Introduction
The More, the Merrier? Interest Groups and Legislative Change in the Public Hearings of the German Parliamentary Committees
Information and Congressional Hearings
The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’ in a decentred state
From where do legislators draw scientific knowledge? Organizations as scientific authorities in four countries' parliamentary debates
Knowledge on Stage
Waiting for the wave
The Distribution of Customary Behavior in a Population
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |