Reconsidering the Derivational Prefix of the Biblical Hebrew t-Stems through Feature Geometry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23024355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy M Hutton (0000-0002-9495-9022, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 30-69 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1876-6633 • E-ISSN: 1877-6930 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/18776930-00701001 |
| OpenAlex | W1134262360 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
A recent publication (Hutton 2011) provided evidence and phonological rationale for Baden’s assertion (2010) that the derivational prefix of the Biblical Hebrew hitpaʿʿēl stem could assimilate not only to the normally recognized ‘dentals’ ( t , d , and ṭ ), but also, in certain ad hoc circumstances, to the affricates ( s , z , and ṣ ) and, eventually, to other classes of segments. This paper analyzes the process from the theoretical standpoint of feature geometry. An analysis informed by theoretical phonology suggests that the underlying derivational phoneme * t was unspecified with respect to voice and some other features. When this underspecified phoneme * t was placed in immediate contact with a segment exhibiting the same place of articulation and manner specifications, it was occasionally linked to the pharyngeal node of the following segment on an ad hoc basis. Along with commonly operational default rules, this linkage helps to explain cases wherein derivational * t assimilated to members of the set of coronal stops and affricates { d , ṭ [t ʕ ], s [ t s], z [ d z], and ṣ [ t s ʕ ]}. Moreover, in a narrow set of instances, the segment * t was linked to the nasal articulator node of the following coronal /n/, or to the root node of a few other coronal phonemes ( š [s], and possibly ś [ɬ] and l ). Over time, these linkages proceeded up the feature tree as the feature spreading was increasingly generalized. This finding is basically consistent with the proposals laid out in Baden 2010 and Hutton 2011, but augments them slightly, providing a more unified, economical, and principled explanation.
Acoustics · Assertion · Consonant · Feature (linguistics) · Hebrew · Linguistics · Node (physics) · Phonology · Physics · Place of articulation · Prefix · Set (abstract data type) · Speech recognition · Vowel · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |