Referential complementarity in traditional Negev Arabic

Bibliographic Data

ID23024366
AuthorsLetizia Cerqueglini (0000-0002-4426-170X, Tel Aviv University), Roni Henkin (0000-0002-7063-4776, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)
Year2018
Volume10
Issue1
Pages83-114
Publication date2018-05-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBrill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1876-6633 • E-ISSN: 1877-6930
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/18766633-00901002
OpenAlexW2769934628
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

Spatial Frames of Reference (FoRs) are mental coordinate systems applied to locate a Figure ( F ) with respect to a Ground ( G ). In Levinson’s theory (2003), every language selects a dominant FoR among Intrinsic, Relative and Absolute, leaving non-dominant FoRs for restricted sets of cases. Bohnemeyer (2011) enlarged this typology, describing ‘referentially promiscuous systems’, as characterized by free switch among FoRs and absence of a default strategy used by the whole community. We show here that Traditional Negev Arabic ( TNA ) represents a new, hitherto unknown type, which we label ‘referential complementarity’: all its speakers use all three FoRs in everyday discourse, yet not freely switching among them. Different Gs of traditional life, when observed in their traditional locations, prime specific referential strategies: inherently partitioned Gs (horse/coffee-pot) prime the binary Intrinsic FoR; those with no inherent partition (stone/tree) prime ternary Relative or Absolute FoRs, depending on their alignment vis-à-vis the Observer ( O ). Interestingly, culturally salient objects considered integral to the tent, such as a hosting cushion or a tent pole, absorb the tent’s Intrinsic orientation; but outside the tent these behave just like their non-tent-integral counterparts (stone/tree). In particular, the Absolute FoR is used for (i) culturally unfamiliar Gs (chair/shoe/dinosaur) and (ii) certain Gs in non-salient O - F - G alignments. We conclude that FoR selection in TNA follows culture-specific rules, paying more attention to cultural familiarity or salience than to supposedly universal metrical and formal features.

Arabic · Cardinal direction · Complementarity (molecular biology) · Geography · Linguistics · Salience (neuroscience) · Salient · Artificial Intelligence · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Philosophy · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub