American Humanist Association v McCarty

Federal constitutional law – Establishment of religion – Advancement of religion – Endorsement of religion – Sponsorship of religion – Favouring or preferring religion – Inhibiting, interfering with, or coercing religion – Board meetings and membership – Education – Prayer and meditation – Plaintiff attending board meetings at Birdville High School (BISD) as student and later as alumnus – Plaintiff objecting to student-led ‘invocations’ and ‘student expressions’ at meetings as favouring religion over non-religion – With American Humanist Association, plaintiff suing for monetary damages from individual school board members, and for declaratory and injunctive relief – Plaintiffs alleging BISD policy, practice, and custom of permitting, promoting, endorsing prayers violating Establishment Clause – BISD moving for summary judgment, asserting invocations either (1) qualifying as private speech, (2) satisfying conventional Establishment Clause tests, or (3) fitting within legislative prayer exception to those tests – District court granting summary judgment to defendants on ground of legislative prayer exception – Plaintiffs bringing appeal – Whether invocations constituting legislative prayer rather than school prayer for purposes of legislative prayer exception to Establishment Clause – Whether student-led legislative prayers violating Establishment Clause – Whether board members standing and bowing heads during invocations violating Establishment Clause – US Const Amend 1

Appeal · Damages · Establishment Clause · First amendment · Free Exercise Clause · Legislature · Plaintiff · Political science · Prayer · Sociology · Supreme court · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal Issues in Education · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy