Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tribunale Amministrativo regionale del Lazio, sentenza no 8990/2016

No 8990/2016: Regional Administrative Tribunal of Lazio, Italy: Sapone (President), Biancofiore (Counsel, Drafter of the Judgment), Storto (Counsel): 2 August 2016

Bibliographic Data

ID23028017
AuthorsCristiana Cianitto (0000-0003-1600-6784), Michele Saporiti (0000-0002-2415-8991)
Year2017
Pagesrww067
Publication date2017-01-27
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOxford Journal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2047-0770 • E-ISSN: 2047-0789
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ojlr/rww067
OpenAlexW2582022692
LanguageEN

Human rights – Freedom of religion or belief – Conscientious objection to abortion – Doctors’ right to freedom of conscience – Women’s right to health – Provisional administrator’s decree obliging Family Advice Bureaux doctors to issue both certificate of pregnancy and certificate for undergoing its voluntary interruption – Whether doctors of Family Advice Bureaux, who objected to ‘morning-after pill’, entitled to refuse to issue certificate of pregnancy or certificate for undergoing voluntary interruption of pregnancy – Whether entitled to refuse the prescription and administration of ‘morning-after pill’ – Italian Constitution, art 32 – Law 194/1978, art 9 – Provisional administrator’s decree of 22 May 2014 The Administrative Tribunal ruled that the provisional administrator’s decree of 22 May 2014 obliging Family Advice Bureaux doctors to issue both a certificate of pregnancy and a certificate for undergoing its voluntary interruption did not violate the doctors’ right to freedom of conscience. First, those activities represented the professional duties. In providing the certificates doctors were not ‘specifically and directly’ taking part in an abortion procedure, as required by the exemption set out in the conscience clause of the Italian Abortion Act (Article 9 of Law 194/1978). Second, women might change their mind and decide not to abort. Therefore, the bare act of certifying a women’s pregnancy was a preliminary act and it did not affect the objectors’ conscience.

Abortion · Birth certificate · Certificate · Conscience · Constitution · Decree · Pill · Political science · Pregnancy · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Reproductive Health and Technologies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae