The Ministerial Exception—Comparative Perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23028068 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pamela Slotte (0000-0003-4271-6982, Research Council of Finland, corresponding author), Helge Årsheim (0000-0001-6411-6123, University of Oslo) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-198 |
| Publication date | 2015-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-0770 • E-ISSN: 2047-0789 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ojlr/rwv008 |
| OpenAlex | W2016947254 |
| Language | EN |
This essay introduces the theme of the Special Issue on the legal practice of granting ‘ministerial exceptions’ to religious organizations and its relation to the principle of collective religious autonomy. It introduces and situates the other essays and their analyses of how concrete national and regional jurisdictions address calls for collective religious autonomy and ministerial exceptions within the wider debate regarding the nature of and relation between ‘religion’ and (secular) ‘law’ in late modern, religiously diverse societies. Additionally, the essay contributes to the Special Issue theme with an analysis of the ministerial exception in the international human rights framework, examining the practice of the United Nations and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The essay suggests that some of the difficulties law encounters with collective religious autonomy may be due to the rigidity of formerly established (modern) categories for thinking about law and religion in the constitutions of liberal states.
Autonomy · Human rights · Political science · Relation (database) · Sociology · Theme (computing) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Religious Freedom and Discrimination
| Highly cited | No |
|---|