Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Indonesia's Supreme Court Judgment on Religious Clothing

Failing Women and Girls in Public Schools?

Bibliographic Data

ID23028069
AuthorsMohammad Ibrahim (0000-0003-1465-8607, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume10
Issue3
Pages500-508
Publication date2022-04-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueOxford Journal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2047-0770 • E-ISSN: 2047-0789
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ojlr/rwab019
OpenAlexW3217624604
LanguageEN

In May 2021, the Indonesian Supreme Court delivered a unanimous judgment that struck down a joint ministerial decree prohibiting local governments and public schools from imposing religious clothing on female students, teachers, and staff.1 The joint ministerial decree was issued following public criticisms and media coverage of the religious dress code enforced in public schools in Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia. The Court held that such a decree conflicted with various provisions in the national legislations, including laws on regional government,2 child protection,3 law-making,4 and the national education system.5 Accordingly, the Supreme Court justices presiding over the case, Yulius, Irfan Fachruddin, and Is Sudaryono, instructed the Minister of Education and Culture, the Minister of House Affairs, and the Minister of Religious Affairs to rescind the joint decree. This comment explores and critically examines the Court's reasoning of the decision that has, consequently, legitimized local governments and public schools’ policy to enforce mandatory hijab on Muslim and non-Muslim female teachers, staff, and students at public schools across the country. It argues that the Court's ruling, in this case, is highly unreasoned and questionable, lacking in details in some respects, and failing to address the encroachment of women and girls' rights that should have been given appropriate consideration.

Decree · Establishment Clause · First amendment · Free Exercise Clause · Government (linguistics) · Political science · Religious discrimination · Sociology · Supreme court · Gender and Women's Rights · Law · Legal Studies and Policies · Marriage and Family Dynamics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae