Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Franciscan Alliance v Burwell

Bibliographic Data

ID23028209
AuthorsD Thayer (0000-0001-5205-8691, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume6
Issue2
Pages418-419
Publication date2017-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOxford Journal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2047-0770 • E-ISSN: 2047-0789
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ojlr/rwx028
OpenAlexW2612823614
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Federal civil procedure – Preliminary injunction – Federal administrative law and procedure – Jurisdiction – Administrative exhaustion – Standing – Ripeness – Judicial review – Civil rights – Sex discrimination – Gender identity – Termination of pregnancy – Exercise of religion – Private healthcare providers and eight states bringing action against United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and HHS Secretary, challenging regulation enacted pursuant to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) that prohibits discrimination on basis of gender identity and termination of pregnancy – Healthcare providers and states moving for preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of regulation – Whether plaintiffs having standing to maintain action – Whether action ripe for judicial review – Whether ACA non-discrimination provision indicates congressional intent to forbid pre-enforcement review of regulation and therefore precludes judicial review under Administrative Procedure Act (APA) – Whether regulation’s inclusion of gender identity within definition of sex discrimination conflicts with Title IX prohibition of sex discrimination in violation of APA and therefore is contrary to law – Whether failure by HHS to include Title IX’s religious and abortion exemptions in regulation rendering regulation arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law in violation of APA – Whether plaintiffs demonstrating substantial likelihood of success on claim that regulation violates Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as applied to providers, as required to obtain preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of regulation – Whether nationwide injunction warranted to prohibit enforcement of regulation’s prohibition of discrimination on the basis of gender identity and termination of pregnancy – Fed R Civ Pro 65 (Injunctions); US Const art 1 § 8 (Spending), US Const art 3 (Justiciability), US Const art 5 (Due process), US Const Amend 1 (Speech); 42 USC § 18116(a) (Non-discrimination), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 45 CFR § 92.301 (Enforcement mechanisms), 45 CFR § 92.4 (Definitions); Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), codified at 42 USC § 2000bb through 2000bb-4; Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Pub L 79–404, 60 Stat 237; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Pub L 111-148, 124 Stat 119; Non-discrimination in Health Programs and Activities, 81 Fed Reg 31376–31473, codified at 45 CFR § 92

Employment discrimination · Enforcement · Health care · Jurisdiction · Law and economics · Medicaid · Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act · Plaintiff · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal Cases and Commentary · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

  • Uncertainty and Confusion Regarding Transgender Non-discrimination Policies

    Open Access•Jaclyn M White Hughto, David J Meyers et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2021

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae