Hollingsworth v Perry
(Docket no 12-144): Supreme Court of the United States: Roberts CJ joined by Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan JJ; Kennedy, Sotomayor, Thomas, and Alito JJ, dissenting: 26 June 2013
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23028359 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Thayer (0000-0001-5205-8691), Matthew Worley (0000-0002-3049-8714) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 469-469 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-0770 • E-ISSN: 2047-0789 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ojlr/rwt037 |
| OpenAlex | W1964111526 |
| Language | EN |
Constitutional rights – United States – Federal procedure – Standing to defend – California citizen initiative defining marriage as between a man and a woman challenged by same-sex couples in federal district court as unconstitutional violation of equal protection and due process – Named defendant government officials refusing to defend – District court granting initiative proponents permission to intervene and standing to defend – Declaring initiative unconstitutional – State Supreme Court certifying to federal circuit court authority of intervenors to defend – Circuit court affirming opinion of district court – Whether standing granted by district court sufficient for persistence of ‘actual controversy’ through all stages of litigation – US Const art 3
Certiorari · Dissenting opinion · Government (linguistics) · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Substantive due process · Supreme court · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Law · Legal Cases and Commentary · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|