Interpreting Religion
The Case of Jihad
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23028618 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael O’Donoghue (0000-0002-5707-0929, University of South Australia, corresponding author), Michael O'Donoghue |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-12 |
| Publication date | 2009-08-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Academic Study of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-704X • E-ISSN: 2047-7058 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/arsr.v22i1.3 |
| OpenAlex | W2134706005 |
| Language | EN |
Scholars of religion and western Muslims have been accused of glossing over the aggressive interpretation of jihad in Islam in order to make the religion more palatable to a western audience. This paper argues that the accusation is based on a narrow understanding of the available hermeneutical strategies and, by exploring some of the interpretative tradition, highlights the point that religions are rich reservoirs of meaning developed in multiple contexts. As living traditions religions can, and do, call on different meanings from this reservoir.
Aesthetics · Epistemology · False accusation · Hermeneutics · Interpretation (philosophy) · Islam · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Order (exchange) · Political science · Sociology · Theology · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|