Post-industrial Solidarity or Meritocracy?
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Department of Social Sciences, Roskilde University, Denmark |
ANO | 1999 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Acta Sociologica |
ISSN | 0001-6993 |
E-ISSN | 1502-3869 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/000169939904200406 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
1195387a5fed5782fbd512f81f023f99
|
Resumo
The article deals with present forms of social and system integration and discusses what institutional reforms and new formations of actors and coalitions could counteract social exclusion in a way that takes post-industrial conditions into account. The term 'social exclusion' is primarily used in the European discourse, while the concept of an 'underclass' is normally used in the Anglo-Saxon discourse. These two discourses take very different approaches to what can be seen as the forces undermining societal harmony and social coherence. A paradox is identified between the rejection of class theory in most contemporary dominant social theory and the emergence of a new 'underclass'. It is argued that, today, the real missing link is the analysis of the growing power of elites. Whereas the underclass has been almost over-researched, the analysis of new elite formation, collective action, and coalition-building by powerful actors is almost absent. Therefore, the concept of social exclusion should be linked to the concept of social polarization.