Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) L. Smith-Lovin , D. G. Okamoto
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Arizona, University of California, Davis
ANO 2001
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Sociological Review
ISSN 0003-1224
E-ISSN 1939-8271
EDITORA JSTOR (United States)
DOI 10.1177/000312240106600604
CITAÇÕES 8
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 a282006f1958e94d414c1c98586d0ba4

Resumo

Social scientists have devoted a great deal of attention to how much people talk, but have paid little attention to what they talk about. Research in the tradition of conversation analysis suggests that transitions between topics of conversation are accomplished in a systematic, structured way, and that social status can affect whose topics are developed and whose are lost. The authors use insights from conversation analysis to develop a systematic coding system for identifying topic shifts in task-oriented discussions. Hypotheses from the literature on group processes predict who will suggest topic changes in a task-oriented group and whose topics will be lost. Event history methods model the dynamics of topic change in two data sets: a study of six-person laboratory task groups and a replication study of dyads. Topic changes in these task-oriented discussions are more sensitive to status structures that develop within the conversation than to a relatively weak status characteristic like gender. Some of the sequential mechanisms that conversation analysts have studied in the context of less structured, more wide ranging talk may be generalizable to this more constrained conversational environment.

Ferramentas