Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) N. Gross
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Wisconsin-Madison
ANO 2002
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Sociological Review
ISSN 0003-1224
E-ISSN 1939-8271
EDITORA American Sociological Association
DOI 10.1177/000312240206700103
CITAÇÕES 12
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 aef207e4c62a094523feb8759960f3da

Resumo

What social factors influence intellectuals' decisions to affiliate with one intellectual tradition over another? In recent years, many sociologists of ideas have viewed intellectual choice as based on the quest for status within the intellectual field. However, the ' self-narratives ' that thinkers construct to understand who they are as intellectuals are not usually reducible to considerations of status, and the desire to do work resonant with any salient aspect of one's 'intellectual self-concept' may influence the intellectual choices one makes. This issue is explored empirically by examining the case of philosophers who have affiliated themselves with the tradition of classical American pragmatism. Data come from interviews and from a nationally representative survey of U.S. philosophers. Results show that the choice to become a pragmatist is best explained by invoking both theories of status-based choice and the theory of intellectual self-concept. Implications for future research are considered.

Ferramentas