Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Laura Mamo , Janet K. Shim , Jennifer R. Fishman , Adele E. Clarke , Jennifer Ruth Fosket
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
ANO 2003
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Sociological Review
ISSN 0003-1224
E-ISSN 1939-8271
EDITORA JSTOR (United States)
DOI 10.1177/000312240306800201
CITAÇÕES 222
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 2831d23d7d34dd730d40473c12f377ce

Resumo

The first social transformation of American medicine institutionally established medicine by the end of World War II. In the next decades, medicalization—the expansion of medical jurisdiction, authority, and practices into new realms—became widespread. Since about 1985, dramatic changes in both the organization and practices of contemporary biomedicine, implemented largely through the integration of technoscientific innovations, have been coalescing into what the authors call biomedicalization, a second 'transformation ' of American medicine. Biomedicalization describes the increasingly complex, multisited, multidirectional processes of medicalization, both extended and reconstituted through the new social forms of highly technoscientific biomedicine. The historical shift from medicalization to biomedicalization is one from control over biomedical phenomena to transformations of them. Five key interactive processes both engender biomedicalization and are produced through it: (1) the political economic reconstitution of the vast sector of biomedicine; (2) the focus on health itself and the elaboration of risk and surveillance biomedicines; (3) the increasingly technological and scientific nature of biomedicine; (4) transformations in how biomedical knowledges are produced, distributed, and consumed, and in medical information management; and (5) transformations of bodies to include new properties and the production of new individual and collective technoscientific identities.

Ferramentas