Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Y. Cai , E. Kiser
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Washington School of Medicine
ANO 2003
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Sociological Review
ISSN 0003-1224
E-ISSN 1939-8271
EDITORA American Sociological Association
DOI 10.1177/000312240306800402
CITAÇÕES 11
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 afd16e13cb66a860bb5a181809c79824

Resumo

Why did a partially bureaucratized administrative system develop in Qin China about two millennia before it did in European states? In this paper, comparative historical arguments about war and state-making are combined with agency theory to answer this question. The Spring and Autumn and Warring States eras that preceded the Qin unification of China created the necessary conditions for bureaucratization by weakening the aristocracy, creating a bureaucratic model, facilitating the development of roads, and providing trained and disciplined personnel. Comparative analysis shows that the main factor differentiating Qin China from other states and empires was the extreme weakness of the aristocracy produced by an unusually long period of severe warfare. Although Qin China was more bureaucratic than any other state or empire prior to the seventeenth century, it was far from completely bureaucratic. The persistence of monitoring problems prevented its full development, necessitating deviations such as the use of severe negative sanctions, the creation of redundant positions, and limiting bureaucratization to the top of the administrative system. The further development of the bureaucratic administrative system in the Han dynasty is also discussed.

Ferramentas