Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Wisconsin-Madison, Princeton University Press |
ANO | 2005 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | American Sociological Review |
ISSN | 0003-1224 |
E-ISSN | 1939-8271 |
EDITORA | JSTOR (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/000312240507000301 |
CITAÇÕES | 113 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
ff2d658f3ab81cf66668464ecd658ad6
|
Resumo
This article considers the relationship between employers' attitudes toward hiring exoffenders and their actual hiring behavior. Using data from an experimental audit study of entry-level jobs matched with a telephone survey of the same employers, the authors compare employers' willingness to hire black and white ex-offenders, as represented both by their self-reports and by their decisions in actual hiring situations. Employers who indicated a greater likelihood of hiring ex-offenders in the survey were no more likely to hire an ex-offender in practice. Furthermore, although the survey results indicated no difference in the likelihood of hiring black versus white ex-offenders, audit results show large differences by race. These comparisons suggest that employer surveys-even those using an experimental design to control for social desirability bias-may be insufficient for drawing conclusions about the actual level of hiring discrimination against stigmatized groups.