Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Generative AI Exhibits the Lightness/Pitch Correspondence in Image Generation and Classification Tasks

Bibliographic Data

ID23039671
AuthorsJohn Mcewan (0000-0002-9225-4934, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Jennifer C Day (0000-0003-0487-9385, The University of Queensland)
EditorsSaad G Yaseen (0000-0002-3079-9410)
Year2025
Volume2025
Issue1
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Behavior and Emerging Technologies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2578-1863 • E-ISSN: 2578-1863
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1155/hbe2/7109027
OpenAlexW7108775539
LanguageEN
References cited66

A crossmodal correspondence (CMC) is an association between sensory features from different modalities. For example, the lightness/pitch correspondence is the tendency to pair more luminant stimuli with higher pitches and dimmer stimuli with lower pitches. There has been a recent surge in research examining how these associations are present in current generative AI models and to what degree they are language dependent. Previous research on the relationship between CMCs and AI has focused on explicit judgements of association, typically with rating scales. In contrast, other psychology subfields such as social psychology are using implicit measures of associations in AI output. In the present study, we argue for the merits of an implicit functionalist approach to generative AI research in CMCs and use two psychophysical paradigms to demonstrate this approach. Experiment 1 explores how the lightness/pitch correspondence might manifest in text‐to‐image models when they are prompted to visually depict auditory characteristics. The results indicate that DALL‐E 3 consistently employs the lightness/pitch, as well as a contrast/pitch correspondence when attempting to visually depict auditory pitch. Experiment 2 then looks at ChatGPT‐4o′s performance in classifying the images from Experiment 1 as high or low in pitch. We find that ChatGPT‐4o uses both lightness and contrast information to inform its classifications of pitch. The implications of these results regarding the study of sensory associations with AI, as well as the specific future research directions of CMCs, are discussed.

Association (psychology) · Contrast (vision) · Crossmodal · Experimental psychology · Generative grammar · Generative model · Perception · Psychophysics · Multisensory perception and integration · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

  • The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques

    Open Access•Scott O Lilienfeld, James M Wood et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2000

  • Publication Bias in Psychology

    Open Access•Anton Kühberger, Astrid Fritz et al.•PLoS ONE•2014

  • A study in phonetic symbolism.

    E Sapir•Journal of Experimental…•1929

  • The physics of optimal decision making

    Rafal Bogacz, Eric Brown et al.•Psychological Review•2006

  • Crossmodal correspondences

    Open Access•Charles Spence•Attention, Perception, &…•2011

  • Ein experimenteller Beitrag zum Problem der psychologischen Grundlagen der Namengebung

    Open Access•D Usnadze•Psychological Research•1924

  • The organization of semantic associations between senses in language

    Open Access•Jorge Alvarado, Carlos Velasco et al.•Language and Cognition•2024

  • Colour/shape-taste correspondences across three languages in ChatGPT

    Open Access•Kosuke Motoki, Charles Spence et al.•Cognition•2024

  • Darwinian theory, functionalism, and the first American psychological revolution

    Christopher D Green•American Psychologist•2009

  • LLM-based NLG Evaluation

    Open Access•Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu et al.•Computational Linguistics•2025

  • Pitch-based correspondences related to abstract concepts

    Open Access•Lari Vainio, Alexandra Wikström et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change

    Robert J Rydell, Allen R Mcconnell•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition

    Anthony G Greenwald, Debbie E Mcghee et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit

    B Keith Payne, Melissa Burkley et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Self-reports

    Norbert Schwarz•American Psychologist•1999

  • Sensory Linguistics

    Bronwyn Winter, Bodo Winter•Sensory Linguistics•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae