Generative AI Exhibits the Lightness/Pitch Correspondence in Image Generation and Classification Tasks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23039671 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Mcewan (0000-0002-9225-4934, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Jennifer C Day (0000-0003-0487-9385, The University of Queensland) |
| Editors | Saad G Yaseen (0000-0002-3079-9410) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2578-1863 • E-ISSN: 2578-1863 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1155/hbe2/7109027 |
| OpenAlex | W7108775539 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
A crossmodal correspondence (CMC) is an association between sensory features from different modalities. For example, the lightness/pitch correspondence is the tendency to pair more luminant stimuli with higher pitches and dimmer stimuli with lower pitches. There has been a recent surge in research examining how these associations are present in current generative AI models and to what degree they are language dependent. Previous research on the relationship between CMCs and AI has focused on explicit judgements of association, typically with rating scales. In contrast, other psychology subfields such as social psychology are using implicit measures of associations in AI output. In the present study, we argue for the merits of an implicit functionalist approach to generative AI research in CMCs and use two psychophysical paradigms to demonstrate this approach. Experiment 1 explores how the lightness/pitch correspondence might manifest in text‐to‐image models when they are prompted to visually depict auditory characteristics. The results indicate that DALL‐E 3 consistently employs the lightness/pitch, as well as a contrast/pitch correspondence when attempting to visually depict auditory pitch. Experiment 2 then looks at ChatGPT‐4o′s performance in classifying the images from Experiment 1 as high or low in pitch. We find that ChatGPT‐4o uses both lightness and contrast information to inform its classifications of pitch. The implications of these results regarding the study of sensory associations with AI, as well as the specific future research directions of CMCs, are discussed.
Association (psychology) · Contrast (vision) · Crossmodal · Experimental psychology · Generative grammar · Generative model · Perception · Psychophysics · Multisensory perception and integration · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques
Publication Bias in Psychology
A study in phonetic symbolism.
The physics of optimal decision making
Crossmodal correspondences
Ein experimenteller Beitrag zum Problem der psychologischen Grundlagen der Namengebung
The organization of semantic associations between senses in language
Colour/shape-taste correspondences across three languages in ChatGPT
Darwinian theory, functionalism, and the first American psychological revolution
LLM-based NLG Evaluation
Pitch-based correspondences related to abstract concepts
Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit
Self-reports
Sensory Linguistics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |