Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Karin Jonnergård , Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Linnaeus University, Sweden, Lund University, Sweden
ANO 2012
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Current Sociology
ISSN 0011-3921
E-ISSN 1461-7064
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0011392112440440
CITAÇÕES 2
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 7335fa41038d6b284c970b3ac39976ee

Resumo

This article investigates variations in two professions' adaption of quality reforms. The adaption of reforms is viewed as a part of the professions' legitimacy and identity processes. Literature in the area suggests that the adaption of reforms is influenced by the profession's knowledge base, professional norms, organizational belonging and organizational field. The two cases here on how doctors and auditors adapt to quality reforms show that the influences of these factors are, however, moulded by the professions' strategies and the salience of the different aforementioned factors. A general conclusion is that compatibility between the bases of knowledge and the professional norms are vital for the adaption of reforms and that organizational fields are important for setting the agenda. Organizational belongings, on the other hand, seem of less importance for adaption of quality reforms.

Ferramentas