Taiwan
Parent, Province, or Blackballed State?1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2307602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A M Wachman |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 183-203 |
| Publication date | 2000-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Asian and African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9096 • E-ISSN: 1745-2538 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002190960003500110 |
| OpenAlex | W4243779082 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The contentious dispute between Beijing and Taipei about Taiwan's international status entails strongly held, but erroneous, views of China, Taiwan, and the course of history. Beijing's argument that Taiwan is a renegade province is not more persuasive than Taipei's assertion that it is the government of a sovereign state. However, Beijing's political clout is greater than Taipei's, so Beijing has intimidated the international community from accepting Taiwan as a state. Nevertheless, examining legal and historical factors to reconsider the rationale in both Beijing and Taipei makes evident that Taiwan should be viewed as a state
Argument (complex analysis · Assertion · Beijing · China · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · State (computer science · International Law and Aviation · International Maritime Law Issues · Military and Defense Studies · Law
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |