Metrical Typology
English, German, and Russian Dolnik Verse
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23129136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marina Tarlinskaja (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1992 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 1 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1992-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Comparative Literature (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0010-4124 • E-ISSN: 1945-8517 |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1771165 |
| OpenAlex | W2325321418 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
C OMPARING METERS within and between literatures presents problems of differing complexity, depending on what kind of verse systems are juxtaposed. It is easier to match strict forms-for example, syllabotonic meters-because the boundaries that separate each meter from typologically adjacent forms (for example, the iambic vs. trochaic pentameter) are clear-cut. Comparative studies of this kind include Roman Jakobson's Bulgarian Iambic Pentameter Compared to (135-146), Zirmunskij's On National Forms of Iambic Verse, Gasparov's Russian lamb and the English lamb, and my own Meter and Language: Binary and Ternary Meters in English and Russian. The boundaries that separate syllabotonic meters from adjacent forms are harder to establish in certain literatures than in others. For
Archaeology · Art · German · Linguistics · Literature · Typology · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |