Luther and Literacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23130272 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H G Haile (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1976 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 816-828 |
| Publication date | 1976-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0030-8129 • E-ISSN: 1938-1530 |
| Publisher | Modern Language Association (MLA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/461557 |
| OpenAlex | W2313140631 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Luther studies have traditionally been confessionally oriented. Today, this author's significance is also secular, and it is most readily interpreted by disinterested literature teachers. Disputes about his writings radically increased European literacy rates. His songs and pamphlets engaged popular tradition in order to achieve broad, democratic appeal. Aside from the increase in readership after 1518, Luther as critic and interpreter brought about a more important qualitative change in literacy. In this way, he influenced writings of other lands and of later centuries. He treated the Bible as literature with great relevance to the individual life. Karl Holl and Heinrich Bornkamm give excellent accounts of his hermeneutics, but the literature student is most impressed by Luther's imaginative participation in the text. He took his contemporaries and countrymen into account, and their experiences, in order to achieve a meeting between their passions and those of the biblical authors.
Appeal · Art · Art history · Aside · Audience measurement · Democracy · Erasmus · Hermeneutics · Interpreter · Literacy · Literature · Order (exchange) · Passions · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law) · Skepticism · Sociology · The Renaissance · Theology · Classics · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1984 - 2013 (30) |
| Highly cited | No |