Aristotle on Norms of Inquiry
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 23131554 |
|---|---|
| Autores | James G Lennox (0000-0003-4613-2925, University of Pittsburgh, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 23-46 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | HOPOS The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2152-5188 • E-ISSN: 2156-6240 |
| Editora | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/658482 |
| OpenAlex | W2040257230 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
Where does Aristotle stand in the debate between rationalism and empiricism? The locus classicus on this question, Posterior Analytics II. 19, seems clearly empiricist. Yet many commentators have resisted this conclusion. Here, I review their arguments and conclude that they rest in part on expectations for this text that go unfulfilled. I argue that this is because his views about norms of empirical inquiry are in the rich methodological passages in his scientific treatises. In support of this claim, I explore such passages in On Parts of Animals and De anima. I argue that they reach distinct, though complementary, conclusions about the norms governing zoological and psychological inquiries.
Analytics · Data science · Empiricism · Epistemology · Rationalism · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2014 - 2023 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |