Equality of Opportunity and Other-Affecting Choice
Why Luck Egalitarianism Does Not Require Brute Luck Equality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23134604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gideon Elford (0000-0001-8077-7992, University of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 139-149 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10677-011-9331-6 |
| OpenAlex | W1983998462 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 11 |
Economics · Egalitarianism · Epistemology · Inequality · Law and economics · Luck · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
What Is the Point of Equality?
Self-Ownership and Equality
On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice
Inequality
Egalitarian Justice and Innocent Choice
One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice
Luck and Equality
On Dworkin’s brute-luck–option-luck distinction and the consistency of brute-luck egalitarianism
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2023 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |