Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Kassel, Germany, University of California, Davis, The University of Queensland, Bradley University, Florida Atlantic University, Cyprus College, Cyprus, University of Lethbridge, Canada, Kwangju Health College, South Korea, University of the South Pacific, Fiji, University of Rijeka, Croatia, National Computerization Agency, South Korea, University of Central Lancashire, Ghent University, Belgium, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic, University of Tartu, Estonia, University of Idaho, Middle East Technical University, Turkey, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria, University of Lima, Peru, National Autonomous University Of Mexico [email protected], Ramapo College of New Jersey, University of Malta, Malta, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, Illinois State University, Universität Zürich, Switzerland, University of Louisville, Knox College, Université de Montpellier II, France, University of Haifa, Israel, University of Otago, New Zealand, The University of Western Australia, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Germany, University of Dhaka, Åbo Akademi University, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, University of Lisbon, Portugal, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Urban Ethology, Austria, University of the Aegean, Greece, Universidad de La Serena, Chile, The American University in Cairo, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, Baylor University, University of Latvia, Latvia, University of Belgrade, Serbia, York University, Charles University, Czech Republic, State University of New York, Plattsburgh, University of New Mexico, University of San Carlos, Philippines, Clemson University, Université of Laval, Canada, Osaka University, Japan, University of Brasilia, Brazil, Bogaziçi Üniversitesi, Turkey, Al-Akhawayn University, Morocco, University of Catania, Italy, Comenius University, Slovak Republic, University Of Malaya, Humanities Research Cluster Research Cluster Office Level 7, Research Management & Innovation Complex University Of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, Vilnius University, Lithuania, Centre d’Enseignement les Gazelles, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Institute of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Austria, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, The Ruppin Institute, Israel, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe, Vilnius Univeristy, Lithuania, Loyola Marymount University, University of Natal, South Africa, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany, and University of Granada, Spain,, University of Botswana, Botswana, University of Jordan, Jordan, Babes Bolyai University, Romania, University of Cyprus, Cyprus, KPMG Kyriacou Counsultants SA, Greece, Volyn Regional Hospital, Ukraine, The University of Alabama, Univeristy of Ljubljana, Slovenia, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Nicholas Copernicus University, Poland, Vrije Universiteit, Belgium, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, The Netherlands Institute of Social Sexological Research, the Netherlands, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Yuan Ze University, Taiwan, Couple Clinic Indonesia, Surabaya, Indonesia, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, National University, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia |
| ANO | 2004 |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| PERIÓDICO | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
| ISSN | 0022-0221 |
| E-ISSN | 1552-5422 |
| EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022022104266105 |
| CITAÇÕES | 23 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
9e591d0e18c8f6cf90f5196fa61985d3
|
Resumo
As part of the International Sexuality Description Project, a total of 17,804 participants from 62 cultural regions completedthe RelationshipQuestionnaire(RQ), a self-reportmeasure of adult romanticattachment. Correlational analyses within each culture suggested that the Model of Self and the Model of Other scales of the RQ were psychometrically valid within most cultures. Contrary to expectations, the Model of Self and Model of Other dimensions of the RQ did not underlie the four-category model of attachment in the same way across all cultures. Analyses of specific attachment styles revealed that secure romantic attachment was normative in 79% of cultures and that preoccupied romantic attachment was particularly prevalent in East Asian cultures. Finally, the romantic attachment profiles of individual nations were correlated with sociocultural indicators in ways that supported evolutionary theories of romantic attachment and basic human mating strategies.