Similarities and Differences in Implicit Personality Concepts across Ethnocultural Groups in South Africa
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, Tilburg University, University of Pretoria |
ANO | 2013 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
ISSN | 0022-0221 |
E-ISSN | 1552-5422 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/0022022112443856 |
CITAÇÕES | 2 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
db7b11a6f2acd4a889911a3d7ed72903
|
Resumo
Using a combined emic–etic approach, the present study investigates similarities and differences in the indigenous personality concepts of ethnocultural groups in South Africa. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 58 Indians, and 105 Whites, speakers of the country's 11 official languages. A model with 9 broad personality clusters subsuming the Big Five—Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Facilitating, Integrity, Intellect, Openness, Relationship Harmony, and Soft-Heartedness (Nel et al., 2012)—was examined. The 9 clusters were found in all groups, yet the groups differed in their use of the model's components: Blacks referred more to social-relational descriptions, specific trait manifestations, and social norms, whereas Whites referred more to personal-growth descriptions and abstract concepts, and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results suggest that a broad spectrum of personality concepts should be included in the development of common personality models and measurement tools for diverse cultural groups.