Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The common property issue in flood control through land use in F rance

Bibliographic Data

ID23148153
AuthorsBernard Barraqué (0000-0003-4638-3708, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume10
Issue2
Pages182-194
Publication date2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Flood Risk Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-318X • E-ISSN: 1753-318X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jfr3.12092
OpenAlexW2154245255
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited2

Through the example of F rench flood‐control policy, this paper illustrates the general change taking place in the relation of societies and governments to risk. Former policies based on structural measures to reduce the a lea were found excessively expensive, but liberal approaches based on insurance mechanisms were not suited to face extreme events. Better solutions depend on the re‐appraisal of water as a common property and the design of corresponding institutions. In F rance, these could have been the a gences de l'eau , which are now in charge of implementing the W ater F ramework D irective. But back in 1966, central government refused to involve them in flood control, keeping the latter in its own realm. After 1983, successive G overnments preferred to develop c at'nat’ , a solidarity scheme based on taxes added on insurance premiums, and on local risk protection plans ( PPR‐i ) constraining land use rights. This system's benefits and shortcomings are discussed, including the discrepancies between national post‐disaster solidarity and local pre‐disaster vulnerability reduction; it lastly shows recent evolutions towards catchment‐based approaches in complex multi‐level governance, in which the hydrographic district level, adopted to synthesise the f lood r isk m anagement p lans ( FRMPs ), is supplemented by catchment programmes on flood risks called PAPI . Implementing the FRMPs in F rance illustrates the need for economic incentives and common‐pool institutions in multi‐level governance.

Business · Computer security · Control (management) · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental planning · Flood control · Flood myth · Geography · Incentive · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Solidarity · Vulnerability (computing) · Computer Science · Finance · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · French Urban and Social Studies · Law

  • Changes in flood risk governance in France

    Open Access•Marie Fournier, Corinne Larrue et al.•Journal of Flood Risk Management•2018

  • “Functional fit” versus “politics of scale” in the governance of floodplain retention capacity

    Open Access•Joana Guerrin, Gabrielle Bouleau et al.•Journal of Hydrology•2014

  • Drivers and dimensions of flood risk perceptions

    Open Access•Samuel Rufat, W J Wouter Botzen•Global Environmental Change•2022

  • The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations

    Open Access•Thomas Thaler, Lukas Löschner et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Blurring the shoreline

    Open Access•Jesper Petersson•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2021

  • Le couple anticipation/décision aux prises avec l’exceptionnel, l’imprévu et l’incertitude

    Open Access•November, Valérie November et al.•EchoGéo•2020

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2014 - 2022 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae