Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Priorities in accommodating office user preferences

Impact on office users decision to stay or go

Bibliographic Data

ID23148576
AuthorsHilde Remøy (0000-0001-6911-0310, Delft University of Technology), Theo J M Van Der Voordt, D J M van der Voordt (0000-0002-1644-0049, Delft University of Technology)
EditorsRianne Appel-Meulenbroek
Year2014
Volume16
Issue2
Pages140-154
Publication date2014-05-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Corporate Real Estate (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1463-001X • E-ISSN: 1479-1048
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/jcre-09-2013-0029
OpenAlexW2011663368
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

Purpose – When current accommodation is unsatisfactory, office organisations consider relocating to new accommodation that optimally facilitates their main processes and supports image and financial yield. However, due to high vacancy levels, public opinion and governmental awareness oppose new office construction. Reusing existing buildings could be the egg of Columbus. This paper aims at answering the questions: which property characteristics are important push and pull factors for relocation? What does this mean for the decision: stay or go? Design/methodology/approach – A literature review of factors determining organisations' accommodation choices was conducted. Interviews were held with large-scale office organisations and creative organisations, discussing relocation drivers. Henceforth, a survey was held among creative organisations, collecting data about property characteristics important for their preferences. Finally, office user preferences were compared with characteristics of structurally vacant buildings. Findings – Traditional push factors like car accessibility, extension need, and location and building image remain important. Nowadays sustainability issues like reducing energy consumption and better public transportation accessibility are highly prioritised pull factors as well. Regarding the creative industries, bike- and public transportation accessibility, multi-tenancy, and ICT and meeting facilities are most important. Practical implications – Knowing office users' preferences is important to attract and retain stable tenants. If office space supply is highly aligned to end-users' demands and easily adaptable to changing needs, probably more organisations will decide to stay instead of go, leaving behind empty offices. Originality/value – This study combines data about push and pull factors with relocation decision-making, innovatively focussing on the creative industries. The data can be used to explore opportunities and risks of adaptive re-use of the existing building stock.

Accommodation · Business · Consumption (sociology) · Creativity · Leasehold estate · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Relocation · Sociology · Computer Science · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Facilities and Workplace Management · Housing Market and Economics · Marketing

  • Portfolio retrofit evaluation

    Open Access•J J Mcarthur, C G H Jofeh et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2016

  • Cities and the Creative Class

    Richard Florida•Cities and the Creative Class•2005

  • Quantification of economic benefits of multifunctional land use – An empirical analysis among employees

    Open Access•C A Rodenburg•Journal of Housing and the Built…•2006

  • Cities and the Creative Class

    Open Access•Richard Florida•City and Community•2003

Citations per year0.1
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae